My name is Roy Jenkins, in 1969 I was falsely charged with an offence under
the conspiracy act, as the two culprits involved in the crime were man and wife,
I was charged as a conspirator so the police case could be processed to go to
court, the three police officers Farini, Smith and Davis of West Mids police
force admitted to me that they knew I had done nothing wrong, but they needed
another person for their case to hold water and be forwarded to the courts.
The following will be a brief resume for now but a longer version will be sent
to this web site very soon, I am waiting for replies from the Chief Constable
of the West Midlands, Mr. Richard Broadbent, the chairman of HM Customs and
Excise, and from number 10. I have written as advised to, to several authorities
as being the appropriate office to make my complaint to, these are just a few
of them, The Attorney General, The Parliamentary Ombudsman, The Adjudicator,
The Police Complaints Authority, several Chief Constables, West Midlands Police
Authority, the CPS, the Minister for the Treasury John Healy, the Home Affairs
Select Committee, to many others to even mention, their replies. "Your
complaint doesn't come within our remit, therefore we can't investigate your
complaint" about police/customs officers and their corrupt investigators.
I recently sent to Mr Blair at number 10 a copy of documents sent to me this
year by the chairman of customs, the Adjudicator and the Parliamentary Ombudsman
these are included with this letter, I also included a statement allegedly made
by two senior customs officers in 2001, in which, like the unfortunate Dr. Kelly
they referred to me as a Walter Mitty character, shortly after receiving these
letters from me at number 10, my daughters severe disability was suddenly stopped,
so I have to be careful who I mention in this first letter.
In 1969 I was falsely charged by officers of West Midlands police force, I went
to court on several occasions always pleading not guilty, the evening of the
day before I was due in court again I received a call from the barristers office
who was representing me, I was informed by his office that I had to be in court
very early the next morning, I arrived at court at 9-00am where I was met by
my barrister, he informed me that he had had breakfast with the judge, and that
if I pleaded guilty to the offence the judge would give me a one year suspended
sentence, I asked him why should I plead guilty to something I hadn't done,
the barrister then informed me I had two choices, plead guilty or go to jail
because that is what the judge had decided, he also told me to make my mind
up quickly otherwise I would be to late to take advantage of the judges offer,
he told me to go and speak to my solicitor which I did, I asked the solicitor
why should I plead guilty, I was advised that was what was on offer take it
or leave it and this was the way things were done. Reluctantly I said I would
plead guilty, the court was cleared of a mugging case, we then went into the
court, I pleaded guilty and five minutes later I was sitting in the court corridors
with the exact sentence as told to me by my barrister.
While having a coffee and calming down in the court corridor the three police
officers arrived, they asked me if I was ready to go into court, I told them
it was all over, on telling them why they went apeshit, it is the only word
I can think of to describe their actions, they told me how I would regret it,
how they would get me, how they would fit me up, if only I had believed them
at that time I would have emigrated, I just didn't believe they had the power
to do such things.
After the hearing these officers followed me everywhere, they took great delight
in informing me in front of others they would get me, I was offered a job driving
to the continent which I took so I would be out of their way, a few months after
starting this work I noticed one of the shipping documents I gave to customs
in Dover was nothing like the true invoices I had in an envelope, I went into
the customs office on the docks to show them the false invoices, because I believed
I was being set up by the police with the false invoices, I was told by the
customs officers to carry on as if nothing had happened and they would get back
to me regarding the use of the false shipping invoices, I carried on as they
said to, after carrying out several more trips abroad for the company I worked,
I was then made aware later by customs officers that I had knowingly broken
the law, I was told no one would be able to recall me telling customs officers
about the false invoices, I was then threatened, harassed by customs as well.
This went on for many years I will be going into the things they did at another
time as its to long for now, but I started to write to Mrs Thatcher to say what
was going on, her reply it was nothing to do with her office at number 10, I
contacted several other MPs, ministers etc., I wrote to one Minister who promptly
sent my letter to my local DSS office for them to investigate my allegations
against the police/customs.
In 1988 I gave documents of proof of false shipping invoices to a solicitor
who was supposed to be acting for me, this was a Mr. Morrissey of Stratford
upon Avon, he was made aware of the harassment, threats etc. made against me,
he was the duty solicitor for Stratford and Warwick police stations, he at a
later date left letters on my car and sent his own company headed letters to
me threatening me that if I didn't go to his office on a certain Friday afternoon,
he had an appointment on the following Monday at a foreign customs office and
that he was meeting the senior officer there to inform him of the false shipping
documents I had told him about, and given him copies of, I didn't go to his
office on the Friday as he had demanded in his three different letters to me
as I wanted him to carry out his threats, unfortunately he didn't, he did however
have a police officer follow me, Warwickshire Police Complaints Unit first claimed
the officer mentioned by me who was working for Morrissey was in a different
part of Stratford the day he was caught following me, then they claimed he was
the duty officer in Rugby on the day I claimed he had been caught following
me, according to them this officer was in two different parts of the country
on the same day at the same time. Again I will go into greater detail later.
In 1990 I was informed by a reporter that I should buy a tape machine and record
as much as I could of my conversations with police and customs officers, this
I did, in 1990 I started driving for a local firm doing continental deliveries,
I was still writing to various people to see if I could get something done,
as one example of my being tried to be set up, I sat in my truck in the compound
of Italian customs in Milan, a person who claimed he was a lorry driver started
a conversation with me, we were having a coffee in my truck when he opened his
brief case which was full of credit cards, I was offered these cards and told
where I could use them and for how long, I said I couldn't afford them, the
driver then said I could have as many as I wanted and could pay after I had
used them, I again said I wasn't interested, on looking at the drivers hands
I noticed they weren't even marked, drivers have calloused hands where they
handle the steering wheel, ropes and tilts all of the time, this person had
hands like a babies bottom, I didn't take up his offer, but I did put it on
record with the police on tape.
In 1993 I received a call from I believe a customs officer informing me that
a job I had just been offered driving to Portugal and Spain I should refuse
even if I was offered a £1000-00 a week because it was a drugs run, I
was told it was a set up because I wouldn't stop writing to various people asking
for an investigation. I phoned officers I had spoken to and taped previously
about the credit cards being offered to me and other things like the threats
made against me by customs/police officers, I again taped the conversation,
I told the officer from C division of West Midlands Police force that the run
to Portugal was a set up, I pointed out I didn't know how these people had got
my phone number to offer me the job as I was ex directory, I stated on tape
how much the driver would have to collect in Spain for the haulage costs, I
pointed out on tape to the police officer that if anyone did take this truck
to Portugal and Spain the driver would be totally unaware of any drugs hidden
in his trailer. A driver was caught and jailed for nine years for importing
drugs with the trailer I mentioned, before his trial I had handed to a senior
customs officer of customs NISC a copy of the conversation I had had with the
police officer regards this drugs run, this tape has been lost by customs as
I now know. The person who loaded the drugs onto the trailer vanished even though
he had been charged by customs to appear in court.
In 1993 contact was made with Valerie Strachan the then Chairman of customs,
she was informed that something was seriously wrong, she sent to my home a senior
customs officer from the West Midlands NISC to interview me, he was given a
copy of the taped conversations I had had with police and customs officers I
had spoken to, he claimed he was totally independent and I could tell him anything
I wanted to, which I did including the problems I had had since 1969, I met
him several times including one meeting where the customs officer I had complained
about to Mrs. Strachan was also at the meeting. These meetings took place between
October of 1993 to December of 1993. In February of 1994 I received a letter
from the investigating officer sent to see me by Mrs. Strachan, he claimed he
had investigated my allegations and that he had found my allegations had no
basis therefore it was the end of his investigation. Seven years later this
same officer was mentioned in a signed a statement of truth on behalf of customs
for the courts, this statement of truth showed that far from investigating my
allegations in 1993 the officer had in fact been in charge of the case and the
customs and police officers I had complained about to Mrs Strachan, you have
to ask who in customs allowed him to investigate himself and why?
I sent documents to Mr. Major about the corruption and tax evasion by large
companies etc. using false shipping invoices, Mr Major who was the Prime Minister
at the time I sent him the documents, for some strange reason sent these documents
to my local benefits agency for them to investigate, I received a letter from
the benefits agency telling me they had received from Mr Major the documents
I had sent him, but that they were not in a position to investigate tax evasion,
false invoices or transport. You couldn't make it up if you tried.
In one of my taped conversations with the customs officer from the NISC he admitted
to me the following,"the use of dual invoices is rife within the commercial
section, we have one invoice with a low cost in it for British customs, and
another one for the bank etc. of the country the goods are going to with the
correct amount in it, as an example ICI will have two invoices for shipping,
I'm not saying they are at it but they will have two different invoices for
one set of goods" I needed this statement to prove that since I handed
the false shipping invoice to Dover customs way back in 1970 this practice of
false shipping documents goes on every day with the full consent of customs
and the Treasury Ministry, I had been told time, and time again by various people
in authority that I was living in cloud cuckoo land, and that I should write
for Walt Disney as this sort of thing just doesn't happen. Tell that to the
Met whose case was slung out of court in July of 2003 by a judge at Southwark
court.
I faxed letter in 1995 to the then Deputy Chief Constable of West Mids Police
Force confirming I had taped his officers, his response was he passed my letter
to customs for them to investigate my allegations against his officers, after
which he took sudden and early retirement as did his boss, in 1998 I was informed
by West Mids Police Complaints Unit that none of my faxes to this Deputy Chief
Constable could be found anywhere in police records.
The Assistant Chief Investigator for customs to whom my letter was passed to
by the West Mids Deputy Chief Constable, was given five tapes in total by myself
his letter to me confirms this fact, these five tapes I have been given to understand
have been lost by customs. Mr Huish claimed to have held a full investigation
into my allegations, but there is no record of his investigation in customs
files, as I was informed in November of 2002 by customs.
On tape I was informed by the police officers I had taped that customs were
tapping my phone, and that customs had something on me? I believe this is the
same thing that has happened to Malcolm Kennedy and others, on asking BT for
print outs of the tapping of my phone by customs officers I was told I had to
get permission from the police first.
In 1990 I was given a gun by a customs officer for my own protection????, I
told the solicitor Morrissey about this in 1990, I told West Mids. Police C
division about this in 1993, I told the Assistant Chief Investigator Huish of
West Mids. Customs about it in 1995, I eventually handed it in to my local police
station in January of 2000, I made a two tape statement to the Detective Constable
in January of 2000 of how I got the gun, and what had been happening to me regards
police and customs officers, he told me a full investigation would be held into
what I had said on my cautioned tape interview. Several months later the same
officer who had taped my interview came to see me at my home, he told me that
senior officers had told him to drop his investigation into my allegations.
I have been told I was given the gun in the hope I would be caught with it in
my truck, or car or home, as I buried it straight away this was another ploy
that failed.
In January of 2000 I appeared in court as I had bought claims against the police
and customs, the police had been served 160 + documents and the five tapes I
had, because they failed to defend against my claim I was granted costs etc.
by a judge, on appearing before a judge regards my claim against customs he
dismissed my claim because the barrister for customs had pointed out to the
judge that under a 1998 act anything that had happened to me before that year
was statute barred, which meant I had no case against customs, this judge before
making a judgment, asked me for the names of customs officers who had followed
me and members of my family, the names I gave him were later removed from his
judgment. When the judge in the customs case threw out my claim because of this
1998 act, West Mids. Police solicitors decided to go to court to have my costs
case over ruled, they told a judge that the courts hadn't informed them of my
claim, which was a lie as the court officer confirmed, also I had served the
papers and tapes on their solicitor a Mr. Wythe, I included the case number
as well. The judge over ruled my claim for costs that I had been granted as
he claimed the defendants had the right to defend themselves, yet the judge
wouldn't ask the police solicitor why it had taken the police so long to inform
the court they hadn't received my court papers
In January of 2000 I faxed Mr Richard Broadbent Chairman of customs asking him
to investigate properly my allegations, shortly after this I also sent him a
request under the Data Protection Act requesting copies of several documents,
and also copies of the investigations held by customs officers Scahill and Huish
into my allegations, and copies of the log books of Huish, Scahill and Green
regarding meetings, phone calls between them and myself. Between January of
2000 and November of 2002 I received many letters from Broadbent and his Data
Officer telling me the matter was still being looked into, finally in November
of 2002, I received a really small bundle of documents from the Data Officer
a Mrs. Earing, in her letter to me Mrs. Earing the customs data officer claimed
that the officers I met had all retired, and that as the Data Officer she couldn't
find any of the files these officers had made of their investigations into my
allegations, this claim I found strange because she had also included in the
bundle she sent to me, a copy of a statement made by the two officers whom I
had met in 1993, they signed this statement which was made in 2001, they claimed
in their statement that before making it, they had both read their log book
and files that they had on me from 92/93/94,(yet Mrs. Earing claims she couldn't
find any files these officers had made) the first officer in this written statement
claimed he had met me in a certain town, I have never met any officer of any
force in the town he mentions in his statement, I was first introduced to him
by a police officer from C division of West Mids. Police force at Walsall Road
police station. The second officer in this statement allegedly made in 2001
makes a claim that he first met me at a pub car park near my home in a town
that he mentions, he actually first met me at my home after I had contacted
Mrs Strachan the Chairman of customs, the town he mentions that he first met
me at in his statement is actually 20+ miles from where I live and where he
first met me, I have never lived in or near the town he mentions.
The second officer in this statement was supposed to have investigated the first
officer in this statement, which he fails to mention, this second officer then
claims I never gave him anything at the meeting we had at my home at my home,
again this is a lie because I gave him a copy of a tape as I have explained
earlier in this letter, this officer then goes on to call me a Walter Mitty
character because I couldn't tell truth from fiction. Why is it that people
who have 100% proof that officers from police and customs are corrupt are called
Walter Mitty characters, yet officers who lie, commit perjury, cover up for
one another are classed as being as honest as the day is long?
This statement wasn't written by the two officers in 2001, because if as they
claim they had read their log books and files before making this statement they
would have known I had never met them in the towns they have mentioned, this
statement of 2001 has been made by someone from Mr. Broadbent's office with
his knowledge and authorisation to cover up the corruption, incompetence, negligence,
perjury and misleading of judges by his officers, the following documents will
confirm this.
In March of 2003 I received a letter from Richard Broadbent, chairman of HM
Customs and Excise, the letter was dated 11/3/03 and is included below.
Richard Broadbent
Chairman
New Kings
Beam House, 22 Upper Ground London, SE1 9PJ
Tel: 020 7865 5001 Fax: 020 7865 5048
richard.Broadbent h_mce.qsi.aov_.uk
H M Customs and Excise
Mr R Jenkins
11 March 2003
Dear Mr Jenkins,
I understand that the Assistant Private Secretary to the Economic Secretary wrote to you on 7 February 2003, I have been asked to reply.
As you know, Customs, the Adjudicator and the Parliamentary Ombudsman have examined your complaint on several occasions and none of the allegations were found to have any substance. The papers supplied to you under the Data Protection Act are the papers contained in our file. At no time have we said that they were copies of investigations undertaken by any officers. No officer investigated you. They merely met you to ascertain whether you had any information you wished to pass on concerning smuggling activity. Mr Scahill was asked to speak to you when you faxed papers to Dame Valerie Strachan's office. He was not asked to investigate; hence there are no copies of his investigation. The information dated 2001, to which you refer in your letter of 8 November to Richard Broadbent, was provided by officers when asked to give a resume of their dealings with you. This was in order for us to respond to a letter from you. Once again, I refer you to Paul Evans' letter of 23 August 2002, which sets out the department's position.
I understand that the Ombudsman is examining your additional complaint about how your request under the Data Protection Act was handled. I can assure you that we will provide the Ombudsman with any information she may request in connection with your complaint.
Since 1993, we have tried to answer your complaints on each occasion you have written to us, but I regret there is nothing more we can do to assist you.
Yours sincerely
Kerrie Spendiff
Chairman's Private Secretary
In this letter Broadbent states"as you know, Customs, the Adjudicator and
the Parliamentary Ombudsman have examined your complaints on several occasions
and none of the allegations were found to have any substance" Broadbent
follows this up by now claiming that Mr. Scahill who came to see me regards
my complaints to Mrs. Strachan in 1993 wasn't investigating me, of course he
wasn't investigating me he was supposed to have been investigating my allegations
against other customs officers and police officers they worked with, Broadbent
claims I first went to customs regards smuggling, wrong again I went to customs
regards the use of false shipping invoices and tax evasion by large companies
and others, this fact was confirmed on tape by customs officer Don Green in
1993, Mr A. Huish the Assistant Chief Investigator for West Mids and South Wales
customs also claimed in 1995 he was investigating my allegations. Broadbent
refers to the letter I sent to him with a copy of the statement allegedly made
by the two officers in 2001 , you will see he refuses to reply to the questions
I put to him of the validity of the 2001 statement but instead he refers me
to Mr Evans again. I have to ask how do these people get to be in top jobs.
He claims that the Parliamentary Ombudsman is dealing with my allegations, yet
the Ombudsman in a letter she sent to me in May of 2003(included later) claims
she has not spoken to Broadbent about me.
Why was Scahill sent to interview me in 1993 about my allegations to Mrs Strachan,
when it is shown in customs records and in a statement of truth their solicitors
presented to the courts in January of 2000, that Scahill had in fact been in
charge of the case I had complained about to Mrs Strachan, and he had also in
fact been in charge of the customs and police officers I had complained about
to Mrs Strachan in 1993, did no one from customs pick up the fact that Scahill
was investigating himself, his own case and his own officers, why did Scahill
fail to pass on the copy of the tape I gave to him at my home in 1993 to the
drivers solicitor as he promised to do, the tape showed that customs had committed
perjury in this drivers case, why on my sending copies of the transcripts of
this tape to Southampton Court where the driver was found guilty, and in my
explaining to the court manager that perjury had been committed in this case
by customs and police, did Southampton courts then pass my letter on to customs
for them to deal with. I have a letter from Lord Irvine telling me that perjury
is a criminal matter and can only be dealt with by the police.
I first contacted the Adjudicators Office on the advice from a Mr. Paul Evans,
Director of customs, when I first spoke to the adjudicator they told me that
on looking at their computer it showed that I had written to them on several
occasions, when I said I hadn't they looked again and said it was a mistake
on their behalf, it was actually a Mr. Evan's of customs who had been contacting
them regards my complaint. I sent several documents to the Adjudicators office
at their request concerning corrupt customs officers and perjury by customs,
they wrote straight back to say that they had suddenly found that my allegations
against customs officers didn't come within their remit, therefore there was
nothing further they could do. So out of curiosity I faxed the Adjudicator a
copy of Broadbent's letter dated 11th of March 2003 and I requested copies of
their several investigations into my complaints as claimed by Broadbent. Their
reply was sent to me on the 3rd of April 2003 and is included.
T
H E HAYMARKET HOUSE
ADJUDICATOR'S
28 HAYMARKET
LO NDON SW1Y 4SP
O F F I C E TELEPHONE:
020 7930 2292
FOR COMPLAINTS
ABOUT INLAND REVENUE, VALUATION OFFICE AGENCY, FAX: 020 7930 2298
CUSTOMS & EXCISE,
PUBLIC GUARDIANSHIP OFFICE e-mail: adjudicators@gtnet.gov.uk
www.adjudicatorsoffice.gov.uk
Typetalk facilities
available
DX 147385 Piccadilly
7
DATE: 3 April 2003
OUR REF: CUSO 1/22927
YOUR REF:
Dear Mr Jenkins
Thank you for your letter of 26 March 2003.
When I wrote to you on 12 February 2003 I set out where things stood with this office.
I can only confirm again that we looked at your complaints and decided that they did not come within the remit of this office.
We have not and do not intend to investigate your complaints.
I must emphasise again that there has been no collusion between anyone in this office and Mr. Evans of Custom and Excise's National Investigation Service.
I am -sorry we cannot help you but, like the Parliamentary Ombudsman, having made our position clear I can see no purpose in corresponding further on these matters.
You will see Mr. Gordon
of the Adjudicators Office states in his reply to my request for copies of their
investigations into my allegations as claimed by Broadbent. That"We have
not and do not intend to investigate your complaints" he also confirms
my allegations do not come within the remit of their office. Why has Broadbent
lied about this and why hasn't he been taken to task by the Adjudicator or Mr
Blair, for falsely using the Adjudicators name to cover up for the corruption
in customs.
I then faxed Broadbent's letter to me of the 11/3/03 to the Parliamentary Ombudsman
again asking for copies of the several investigations she carried out as claimed
by Broadbent in his letter to me. Previously to Broadbent's letter to me of
the 11/3/03, I had contacted the Ombudsman and had sent her documents of proof
that her office had requested, she had written back to me claiming she had received
my documents, she then wrote back to me again to say that she had spoken to
Broadbent about my allegations and documents, and like the Adjudicator, the
Parliamentary Ombudsman suddenly found that my allegations didn't come within
her remit. In reply to my request for copies of the several investigations carried
out by the Parliamentary Ombudsman as claimed by Broadbent in his letter to
me of the 11/3/03, the Ombudsman then sent me a letter dated 20th May 2003 with
her reply, and is included.
OMBUDSMAN
OFFICE OF
THE PARLIAMENTARY COMMISSIONER FOR ADMINISTRATION
MILLBANK TOWER, MILLBANK, LONDON SWIP4QP
SWITCHBOARD 020 7217 3000, FAX 020 7217 4000, DIRECT LINE 020 7217 4127
Mr R Jenkins
20 May 2003
Dear Mr. Jenkins,
YOUR COMPLAINT AGAINST HM CUSTOMS AND EXCISE
I refer to your faxed letter of 6 May addressed to the Parliamentary Ombudsman.
The Ombudsman has not investigated your complaint. That being so, the question of whether your complaint had substance or not did not arise. It follows that we have made no comment to Mr. Broadbent about the substance of your complaint.
Christine Corrigan
Director
The Ombudsman replies to my request by stating "The Ombudsman has not investigated
your complaint, that being so, the question of whether your complaint had substance
or not did not arise. It follows we have made no comment to Mr. Broadbent about
the substance of your complaint". Again Broadbent has lied using the name
of another authority without their knowledge, surely this is a criminal act,
yet no one has done a thing.
I have recently written to the Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police Force
Mr Scott-Lee asking him again to investigate my allegations, I have sent him
copies of the above letters and copies of the false statements made in 2001
which Broadbent claims was signed by Don Green and James Scahill both of the
NISC. In November of 2002 I faxed to Mr Scott-Lee copies of the statement made
by customs officers Green and Scahill, along with a copy of the statement of
truth sent by customs solicitors to the courts in December of 1999, this statement
of truth confirmed that Scahill had lied to me in 1993 when he told me he was
an independent investigator, when Mr Scott-Lee passed these documents along
to his Head Of Complaints and Discipline a C/S Baker, Mr Baker took early retirement,
he knew these documents showed he had lied and covered up on behalf of police
officers of C Division and customs officers, namely Scahill and Huish.
I recently sent copies of the letters I received from the Adjudicator and the
Parliamentary Ombudsman where they both confirmed that Broadbent had lied to
me in his letter of the 11/3/03, I have asked Broadbent for an explanation of
why he has lied on the many claims he has made, as yet no reply.
In 1997 Chief Constable Crew of West Mids. Police force had requested an investigation
into my complaints by his complaints and discipline unit, I was interviewed
by a DI Leary who I was told belonged to the complaints unit, it turns out he
was a forensic officer, although DI Leary told me in July of 1997 he would get
back to me within a few days, I didn't actually see him again until around April
of 1998 with his boss??? a DCI Ferris, Mr Ferris claimed that none of my documents
could be found on police records, on my offering copies to him he declined to
accept them, on being told of the five tapes of his officers of C Division and
customs officers, he claimed that if he asked customs for copies of the tapes,
he would be told by customs they had been lost, again I offered him copies of
the tapes which he again declined to accept, I received a letter from DCI Ferris
in I believe June of 1998 in which he claimed my allegations had been fully
investigated and recorded, yet he failed to pass his recorded investigation
on to the Police Complaints Authority as is required by the Police Act of 1996,
and this has also been confirmed to me in writing by Sir Alistair Graham, the
chairman of the PCA, he stated that a Chief Constable has a statutory duty to
refer all recorded complaints and investigations to the PCA, and that it was
a criminal act for the Chief Constable to fail to do so. Yet on being sent a
copy of Ferris's letter to me, the PCA then claimed they couldn't do anything
unless requested to do so by the police. I sent a copy of the PCA's letter to
me to the West Mids. Police Authority, they wrote back to say they couldn't
do anything unless requested to do so by the PCA.?
DCI Ferris, Chief Constable Crew, DI Leary and others all appeared on a Panorama
program in 1998 shortly after Ferris was made fully aware of my tapes, all of
the officers in C division were allowed to resign or retire without any loss
of their pension, it appears that all of the customs officers involved have
also been able to resign with their full pension intact.
I sent copies of my tapes to the CPS in the West Midlands, their head of office
wrote to say the contents of my tape was nothing to do with them, people in
the West Midlands may recall the CPS allowed these officers from C Division
to retire and resign from their jobs as they claimed their was insufficient
evidence to take them to court.
Funny how the CPS look the other way when hundreds of innocent people are sent
to prison on false evidence manufactured by both police and customs officers.
There are hundreds of lorry drivers in jails in the UK and Europe all jailed
for buying and smuggling drugs, how can a lorry driver buy millions of pounds
worth of drugs on a drivers wages, why are the lorries never followed to their
destination so police or customs can catch the real importers, a good many people
are set up by customs and police officers as has been proved at the recent trial
in Southwark where the judge threw out the case and accused the Met of deliberately
setting up innocent people with money laundering charges and drugs offences.
For 20 odd years I have had customs officers, police officers, MPs and others
I have contacted regarding the false invoices etc., telling me that I lived
in cloud cuckoo land by claiming this setting up of innocent people by officers
goes on.
I sent to Tony Blair in 1997 a bundle of documents showing corruption, I received
a reply from his correspondence officer claiming my documents had been sent
to the appropriate office for them to deal with, two years later I found these
documents by accident, Mr. Blair had sent them to Lord Irvine's office, where
they were then passed on to the office that tells judges where they would be
sitting for the next three months, this office wrote to me to say they had no
idea why these documents of mine had been sent to them by Blair for them to
investigate my allegations, yet they still sat on them for two years.
In 2002 I appeared before a Lord Justice regards an appeal of mine, he refused
to allow me an appeal but he confirmed in his judgment that my building society
had presented false paperwork at the original hearing I had, he stated the figures
the building society produced in court were gobbledegook and did not exist in
the societies official paperwork, he stated that I did have a case at the original
hearing and that I should have been awarded costs, he also states that the society
should not have been allowed by the judge to present 32 documents on the day
of the original hearing. My problems with my society began in March of 1994,
again I taped my conversations with them, strangely customs were committing
perjury in Southampton Court in Jan/Feb of 1994 as my tapes show, I go back
to where I was told we will fit you up.
I have recently been told by the Bar Council in another matter of mine that
the Commissioner has decided on receiving my papers that a full hearing should
be held into the actions of my barrister.
The Parliamentary Ombudsman when she was the Legal Services Ombudsman allowed
letters to be entered in the defence of the solicitor Morrissey which had been
written two years after the date on the letter, I received a letter of confirmation
from the Office of Supervision of solicitors dated June of 1997 confirming they
had sent me all copies of Morrissey's letters that they had received from him.
On I believe the 14/4/97 Morrissey wrote to the OSS stating he couldn't remember
me, he had never been to court on my behalf, he didn't know where all my documents
were that he had of mine, I sent the OSS documents showing that Morrissey had
been to court on my behalf, he had taken money from me for barristers and court
costs. Yet in 1999 the Legal Service Ombudsman Anne Abrahams (now being the
Parliamentary Ombudsman) threw out my claim against Morrissey and the OSS based
on a letter dated the 15/4/97, in which Morrissey claimed he has received a
message from Warwickshire Fraud squad claiming that I had no evidence against
him therefore the police had dropped my claim of fraud by Morrissey.
I contacted the Legal Services Ombudsman to say I had no knowledge at all of
this letter of the 15/4/97 sent by Morrissey to the OSS, and that in all of
the documents and letters sent to me up until June of 1997 by the OSS this letter
of the 15/4/97 from Morrissey did not exist, further that a recorded delivery
letter that was sent by me to Warwick Fraud squad on the 16/4/97, was the first
of any evidence that I had sent to Warwickshire fraud squad, how then was Morrissey
able to write to the OSS on the 15/4/97 claiming he had been informed by Warwick
fraud squad that I had no evidence against him. As mentioned earlier in this
account Morrissey had a police officer working for him, this was a DS Franklin
of the Warwickshire fraud squad as confirmed by Morrissey in a letter, when
Franklin came to my home initially to interview me he tried all ways to get
me to drop my claim, it wasn't until I read Morrissey's letters to me referring
to where Franklin had been caught following me, did I realise why Franklin had
tried to get me to drop my claim against Morrissey.
I sent copies of Morrissey's letter to me where he had named Franklin to Warwick
Fraud Squad, lo and behold Franklin was swiftly and suddenly transferred to
another division, the officer who took over from him visited the OSS, I taped
a conversation I had with my case worker at the OSS and he was very concerned
as to what the police were telling me.
Over the years after writing to Prime Ministers many odd things have happened
to me, I have been accused of many things all of which I have proved to be untrue.
I would like to know how many people have been jailed on false evidence produced
by the above officers and squads, or who have been put in the same position
as myself, I'm sure it would make interesting reading.
We are told by our Prime Minister Mr. Blair that we have no money for Old Age
Pensioners, schools, hospitals etc., yet he is more than happy to knight or
make a lord of any chairman of a company that funds his party, how many of them
use false invoices for the purpose of tax evasion.
As I have stated at the top of this letter I sent documents to Mr Blair in June
and July of this year, my daughters severe disability payments were suddenly
stopped, this isn't a one off for me, its like dealing with the Gestapo or the
KGB when contacting our authorities regards a complaint, they have no shame
and appear to have no morals or ethics either, yet they preach to the public
as if they do.
JUSTICE WILL OUT. Charlie Collins the 3rd rules OK!
R. Jenkins.