THE RICH AT PLAY

RPM number 9 - Chapter 4

THE COUNTRYSIDE ALLIANCE
– VOICE OF THE RURAL DISPOSSESSED?!

The Countryside Alliance hadn’t even been formally established when it held a 50,000 strong demonstration in central London in July 1997. [1] What united the groups involved in organising the march was their opposition to an anticipated ban on hunting with dogs under the then New Labour government of Tony Blair. As Labour peer Baroness Mallalieu QC said at the rally in Hyde Park which followed the demonstration "Hunting is our music, it is our poetry, it is our art, it is our pleasure." [2] Meanwhile Tory MPs queued up to speak to their followers and they were cheered and applauded widely.

Despite the impressive turn-out, and there were unconfirmed rumours that many on it had been forced to attend by their employers, it is likely that the ‘The Countryside Alliance’ would never have been any more than a pro-hunt group of minimal importance to anyone not interested in the debate. However its appearance coincided with an accelerating crisis in farming and rural communities generally, and it has been able to capitalise on this to gain support among a much wider audience than just hunting enthusiasts.

In essence The Countryside Alliance has been astute enough to realise that it needed to show some concern about genuine rural grievances in order to gain a much larger audience for its pro-hunting views. As such its propaganda for the July 11th 1997 march and rally said "This initiative arose as a response to the frustration and concern felt by country people against the threats posed to the countryside, and the jobs, by politicians and urban influence, through prejudice, ignorance, and diminishing rural representation" [3]

Alongside the claim that without hunting things will get even worse The Countryside Alliance have adopted strategies that have disguised the core interests of the Alliance. The result has been that it has gradually become more and more acceptable and has begun to be taken quite seriously by many as an authoritative voice on rural issues, even those with which they have little connection, for example social exclusion.

These strategies have included:

  1. It was not formally set up until the following year, but the groups initially came together under this title to organise the 10/07/1997 demo.
  2. Daily Telegraph 11.07/1997 and Countryside Alliance Website.
  3. March to Hyde Park Mission Statement, G" section of The Guardian 10.7.97

  4. Richard Meade, Olympic Gold Medal winner for three-day eventing, was expelled from the RSPCA after being accused of spearheading a campaign to infiltrate the society with hundreds of hunting supporters – ‘The Countryman’s Weekly’ 29/06/2001


    In fact, The Countryside Alliance is part of the problem and as such cannot be part of the solution. It should be opposed for several reasons:

    • Obviously, it supports hunting and other cruel sports.
    • It claims to care about all aspects of rural life, yet its structure, origins, membership and staff suggest otherwise: It remains an organisation to defend field sports. (See below)
    • It claims to speak for ‘the countryside’. In fact, it speaks for the leisure interests of the landed gentry and assorted business people.
    • Its proclamations about how hard times are for rural people are fairly shameless considering the role that landowners and business people have played in making sure that times stay as hard as possible for the peasantry. The Countryside Alliance is part of the problem, not the solution.
    • Its funding and investments show a high degree of hypocrisy (see below)
    • Its staff have several conflicts of interest (see below)

Structure

The Countryside Alliance is, formally, an amalgamation of three groups: the British Field Sports Society, the Countryside Movement and the Countryside Business Group, but it is the name "British Field Sports Society Investments Ltd." which appears in the annual accounts, alongside "Countryside Alliance" [1] , suggesting that the amalgamation may not have taken place on very equal terms..

Indeed, the Countryside Movement and Countryside Business Group appear only to have been formed to support field sports. According to a briefing prepared for the CPHA, the Countryside Business Group was at first called the Country Sports Business Group, but changed its name after only a few weeks [2] . American-born corporate lawyer Eric Bettelheim, with the aim of raising funds to protect field sports, founded it.

Bettelheim is qualified to practice law in both the UK and the USA, and is a consultant for Mishcon de Reya, where his Countryside Alliance chum John Jackson is also employed. According to Bettelheim’s potted biography on the Mishcon De Reya website, he specialises in the regulation of financial institutions, derivatives, managed funds, cross-border transactions, and commercial dispute arbitration, venture and development capital. He is a frequent speaker at industry conferences and he is the author of over 40 publications and principal editor of three texts dealing with swaps, futures and commodity products, none of which seems to suggest that he has the concerns of the rural poor at heart. [3] His approach to fundraising seems to have been quite unsuccessful: The Countryside Business Group aimed to persuade businesses which would be threatened by the demise of bloodsports to donate 1.5 per cent of their annual turnover to the cause of defending them, as well as imposing a voluntary national game levy, for example £3 per day for salmon anglers, or 27 p per pheasant.[4] The CBG fell well short of its fundraising targets, however. Perhaps the irony of some of Britain’s richest people trying to solicit protection money from small businesses and individuals was not lost on those who did not pay up.

The Countryside Movement was founded in November 1995, supposedly as a group to campaign on rural issues other than bloodsports. Sir, now Lord, David Steel was its first chairman, and received £93 752 for his efforts. [5] His position on hunting was mixed:

"If I were confronted with an opinion poll and asked to tick a box to
approve or disapprove hunting, I would have to say that I disapprove,
but that is not the point. The point is whether I use my vote in the House
of Commons to ban an activity in which I personally do not wish to take
part when others might use their votes to ban activities in which I do wish to take part."
[
6]

Angling, for example. [7]

Other leading lights in the Countryside Movement were more directly in favour of hunting. At the first two inaugural meetings, those present included Max Hastings, editor of the London Evening Standard (a keen shooter and angler, and Vice President of the Game Conservancy Trust), [8] Earl Peel, Chairman of the Game Conservancy Trust; the Duke of Westminster, then President of the Game Conservancy Trust and the British Association for Shooting and Conservation; and Hugh Van Cutsem, shoot owner and head of the Countryside Business Group (CBG). The Countryside Movement’s Board of Directors also included Robin Hanbury-Tenison OBE, then Chief Executive of the British Field Sports Society and John Swift, then Chief Executive of the British Association of Shooting and Conservation. [9]

The most obvious influence of the BFSS and the Countryside Business Group on the Movement came from funding. Any pretence that the Countryside Movement was a separate body totally disappears with the revelation that the CBG provided £550 000 towards the set-up and development of the organisation and that the BFSS provided £250 000. [10] In addition, the Movement’s main activity, other than advertising itself, seems to have been collecting people’s names and addresses for its database. This was done in a fairly underhand manner, with National Farmers’ Union members’ addresses being passed on without their knowledge or consent. Not only that, but the Countryside Movement had registered the BFSS as a recipient of its database, even though many were no doubt against hunting and had joined up because of concern at the state of the countryside in general. [11]

It can be safely said that if The Countryside Alliance had decided to defend hunting by revealing the names of who was behind it and who was financing it then the vast majority who in opinion poll after poll had expressed their wish to see hunting with dogs done away would probably have hardened their opposition. Much easier was to keep this information hidden, present a more acceptable face and pretend to be concerned about issues which effect not just those in the countryside but in all areas of Britain – issues such as a lack of affordable housing, jobs, children’s future, transport.

Just as fascists in the BNP are forced to take up some elements of working class people’s social conditions and problems to gain support, before giving them a reactionary and right wing direction so those who formed The Countryside Alliance have sought to employ similar methods to get a hearing. Hence The Countryside Alliance even went as far as launching its own "campaign for rural rights" [press release 16.10.97] in late 1997, only a few months before figures released on 30.01.98 revealed that there had been a 50% fall in farm incomes in 1997.

In the intervening period, on Friday November 28th 1997 to be exact, Parliament voted by a massive majority for a ban on foxhunting.

Strangely, two days later The Mail in Sunday even went a far as suggesting Prince Charles was going to quit hunting, aiming no doubt at trying to trick the public into believing that the Royals are not arrogant and really do listen to public opinion. Bear in mind that this was only months after Princess Diane’s death. By December 16th Prince William and Prince Harry were watching a hunt at which Camilla Parker Bowles was riding at, the first time they’d been seen together in public.

Two weeks later, Baroness Ann Mallalieu QC, the new President of the Countryside Alliance, writing in ‘The Field’ magazine of January 1998 said that those involved "include not just field sportsmen of all kinds but those who own and manage most of the countryside. The National Farmers’ Union, the Country Landowners Association [who according to their own web-site own 60% of land in England and Wales], the NFU of Wales, the Scottish Landowners and even organisations like the National Park Communities are powerful voices".

Despite clearly being an organisation set up by, consisting of, financed by, staffed by and run by major landowners and the extremely rich [of which more below] this did not stop the Countryside Alliance displaying a sickening degree of hypocrisy in its defence of hunting putting forward the view that they are a defenceless minority under attack. This continues to this day.

They have continuously presented hunters as the real countryside managers who are responsible for no brutality and as defenders of working people’s jobs, homes and futures. They have even gone as far as using the language of the Civil Rights movement with their "we seek from urban British society more tolerance – and a willingness to listen to us" [Horse and Hound 8.1.98 page 41]

‘Listen to us’ has been the rallying cry amongst poor, hard done sections of society. Those in The Countryside Alliance do not, under any circumstances constitute this. Neither has anyone in a leading position ever displayed such qualities for other actually oppressed groups – a bottle of champagne to anyone who can prove otherwise! No, two bottles. In fact, a crate of the stuff…

Whilst ‘The Countryside Alliance’ has made quite serious attempts to present itself as an organisation which is much wider than bloodsports a look at its structure reminds us that the changes have been largely cosmetic. Its departments are as follows:

PR

020 7840 9220

Membership

020 7840 9240

Political

020 7840 9260

Policy

020 7840 9250

Campaign for Hunting

020 7840 9210

Foresight: Campaign for Shooting

020 7840 9235

Campaign for Falconry

020 7840 9200

Gone fishing: Countryside Alliance initiative for Angling

020 7840 9274

Country Sports & Political Hotline

07774 236101

Honest Food: Campaign for Independent Food

020 7840 9219


Figure 1: Departmental Contact Details for Countryside Alliance, www.countryside-alliance.org/alliance/contact.htm

 

Its departmental contact details betray a distinct bias towards bloodsports, with the campaigns apparently not devoted to bloodsports being vague and undefined. There is not even any section of the website (www.countryside-alliance.org), as of March 28th 2002, devoted to the Honest Food campaign. In fact between July 18th 2000 when ‘Honest Food’ welcomed the ‘ EU proposals that could save rural abattoirs’ [12]

and March 27th 2002 with its ‘welcomes vote in House of Lords as a "triumph of sanity" [13 ], a reference to the Lords postponement of a detailed discussion of the Animal Health Bill until all enquiries into foot and mouth are completed, there was not one peep from the ‘Honest Food’ campaign. During that time the Countryside Alliance issued more press releases about the need for children to be taught how to shoot. See for example Campaign for Shooting press release of July 18th 2001 announcing ‘lessons at the CLA Game Fair’ [14] with reduced prices of £5 for under 18s.

Where?

The Countryside Alliance’s address is:

The Old Town Hall,
367 Kennington Road,
London. SE11 4PT.

tel - 020 7840 9200
fax - 020 7793 8484
e-mail -
info@countryside-alliance.org


Since May 2001, what was the events office has been made into the Commercial Directorate, which is based in Marlborough, Wilts, and is headed by Roger Loodmer.

Who?

The current Board of Directors [as of 29/03/02] consists of:

John Jackson - Chairman

Bill Andrewes – Deputy Chairman

Richard Burge – Chief Executive

Lord Mancroft

Maurice Askew

Prof. Caroline Tisdall

Robert Waley-Cohen

Charles Wilson

David Reynolds

Bob James

Mark Firth

Sam Butler

Given that at least nine of these twelve people are involved in bloodsports, we should not give too much credence to the Countryside Alliance’s pretensions of being a broad-based organisation concentrating on a wide range of rural issues. None of these people have expertise in e.g. food policy or social exclusion, and some are actively involved in perpetuating rural poverty, for example by selling overpriced homes to commuters.

John Jackson


This ridiculously busy man cannot possibly have enough brain-space left to think coherently about the countryside: He is Non-Solicitor Chairman of law firm Mishcon de Reya, Chairman of Ladbroke Group, and Celltech plc.; A Director of Billiton plc, Wyndeham Press Group plc., WPP Group plc., Xenova Group plc., Brown and Jackson plc., and Oxford Technology Venture Capital Trust; Special Advisor to the Korda Seed Capital Fund and Cambridge Animation Systems Ltd.; and one of the four owners of History Today. [15] His original involvement with the Countryside Alliance was through the Countryside Business Group. [16]

Bill Andrewes

Definitely a hunting enthusiast, Bill Andrewes was with the BFSS, before becoming Chairman of the Campaign for Hunting. Having been elected Vice-Chair of the CA Board, he relinquished his other position. [17]

Richard Burge

A zoologist and former Director General of the Zoological society of London, colonel's son Richard Burge is also a Member of the Labour Party. He is a trustee for the Television Trust For The Environment and of the Charles Darwin Centre. He also sits on the council of the Shropshire and West Midlands Agricultural Society. [18] His appointment as Chief Executive is said to have caused consternation in some quarters, particularly after an interview in the Spectator, in which he said that he would take a job from anybody, had never hunted, and that the Countryside Alliance would survive without hunting. [19]

Lord Mancroft

Tory peer Lord Mancroft was Deputy Chairman of the BFSS [20], and is chairman of Inter Lotto UK Ltd. [21]

Maurice Askew

Maurice Askew has been associated with the Union of Country Sports Workers and is or has been Master of the Barlow Hunt in Derbyshire. [22] He is quoted as threatening that "We are fighting for liberty and freedom. My warning for Mr Blair is that if he does not listen to us there will be a civil war in this country, the like we have never seen since the days of Cromwell and Fairfax." [23]

Prof. Caroline Tisdall

Formerly a Guardian journalist, Caroline Tisdall is now Professor of the Department of Rural Future at Oxford Brookes University. She shoots, angles, stalks, hawks and "would die in a ditch to defend hunting". [24]

Robert Waley-Cohen

Owner of a healthcare company, Robert Waley-Cohen has been a steward for The Jockey Club, (also associated with the Jockey Club are fellow CA board member Charles Wilson, Christopher Sporborg, a Countryside Alliance director, and the Duke of Roxburghe [25] and Lord Vestey [26], donors to the CA) is a racehorse owner and is organiser of Upton House Horse Trials. [27] He was an executive of Christies Auctioneers (UK and US) from 1969-1981, and in 1983 founded Alliance Imaging Inc., the largest out-sourced radiology department in the US, followed by Alliance Medical Ltd., the largest out-sourced radiology department in Europe. He is also a trustee of the Countryside Foundation for Education, a member of the National Trust, and the Country Landowners Association (due to being a partner in a farm on land surrounding Upton House in Warwickshire) [28]

Charles Wilson

Charles Wilson is a former Managing Editor of Mirror Group Plc; former Editor of The Times a Trustee World Wide Fund for Nature UK and a member of the Jockey Club. [29]

David Reynolds

Master of the Woodland Pytchley Hunt, David Reynolds is so keen to defend hunting that according to the East Northants. Anti-Bloodsports, he has tried to ride over saboteurs on a number of occasions. [30]

Bob James

A well-known angler, Bob James is Chairman of the Countryside Alliance’s Gone Fishing Campaign.

Mark Firth


Chair of Foresight, the Countryside Alliance’s Campaign for Shooting, Mark Firth is Joint Managing Director of Roxton Bailey Robinson sporting agents. He participates in shooting, fishing, stalking and other country sports in the UK and worldwide. [31]

Sam Butler

Chairman of the Countryside Alliance’s Campaign for Hunting, Master of Warwickshire Hunt and partner in estate agent Butler-Sherborn, Sam Butler is a particularly badly-placed person to be a leading light on an organisation which claims to care about rural communities. His estate agents sell extremely pricey homes to rich folk, with not a hope of the locals being able to afford them. Nick Cohen of the Observer phoned Butler-Sherborne posing as a cash buyer for a remarkably over-priced Cotswold pad. On expressing concern that he could face hostility for being a townie, the saleswoman replied 'Oh no, Everyone round here's a commuter.' [32]

Butler made rather a fool of himself by bellowing without a blush to a demonstration outside the Labour Party Conference: 'Our forefathers didn't fight Hitler to have this lot take away our liberties.' One of Butler's forefathers was 'Rab' Butler, who certainly didn’t fight Hitler. He appeased him throughout the Thirties and then aided Lord Halifax's manoeuvres to force Churchill to bring about a negotiated surrender in 1940. [33]

President - Baroness Anne Mallalieu QC


A Labour peer and great fan of hunting: "Hunting is our music. It is our poetry. It is our art. It is our pleasure. It is where many of our best friendships are made. It is our community. It is our whole way of life." [34]

Deputy President - Lord Marcus Kimball


Educated at Eton and Cambridge, Lord Kimball has been Director of the Royal Trust Bank, External Member of the Council of Lloyds, and Tory MP for Gainsborough in Lincolnshire. He has been Huntmaster of the Fitzwilliam Hounds and Cottesmore Hounds, and frequents Whites and Pratt’s gentlemen’s clubs. [35]

Commercial Directors

Christopher Sporborg

A banker who lives on a farm in Hertfordshire [36]. One wonders what happened to the farmer…

Michael Hoare

A banker from London. [37] A real yokel then…

Nick Bannister

A stockbroker from London. [38] Hmm.

Secretary: Roger Loodmer


An angler from London.

Also of interest is that out of the Countryside Alliance’s token five pounds’ worth of shares, one is held by Andrew Salvesen, who was a Non-executive Director of Christian Salvesen plc. between 1989 and the demerger in September 1997, when he was appointed to the Board of Aggreko plc. He had more than 20 years' with Christian Salvesen, including being Managing Director of Christian Salvesen's former Oilfield Technology operations. He is a Non-executive Director of Smedvig ASA and Stirling Shipping Ltd as well as being Chairman of Robertson Research Holdings Limited, Canvas Holidays Limited and Roxar ASA. [39] Quite what expertise about the countryside this has given him is unclear.

 

Who Else?

Who funds the Countryside Alliance?

A document leaked to The Observer revealed a number of donors to the Alliance. They include:

Prince Charles, who lent his house for a cocktail party

Sir Hardy Amies, the Queen's dressmaker

Lord Vestey, the meat tycoon and polo playing chum of Charles who is page of honour to the Queen.

Marquess of Hartington, chairman of the British Horseracing Board and the Queen's representative of Ascot.

Sir Christopher Bland, Chair of the BBC

Duke of Northumberland [40]one of Britain’s richest men with 132,300 acres who caused controversy by riding roughshod over local opinion by planning to build executive homes in Chatton on his estate. [41]

The Duke Of Westminster– Britain’s richest man, with an estimated fortune of £4 Billion, gets £3, 000 000 in farm subsidies per year for his farm near Chester, [42] is a member of the Country Land and Business Association (CLA, formerly the Country Landowners’ Association), was one of the original board members of the Countryside Movement [43] and has been the President of the Game Conservancy Trust and the British Association for Shooting and Conservation. He is reported to have helped out the Countryside Movement with a £ 1 million-pound ‘loan’. [44] He was also on the Countryside Alliance’s board until a 1998 re-shuffle in order to make themselves look less like the voice of the landed gentry [45], and is one of the Countryside Alliance’s main funders, though rumours that he is the ‘anonymous benefactor’ who provided its offices were denied by the Alliance. [46]

Sir Robert McAlpine, construction company

Sunley Holdings, construction company

Persimmon Homes [47] home-building company. In a stunning piece of hypocrisy, the Countryside Alliance on one hand expresses concern about the destruction of greenfield land and recognises that "the problems caused by this type of development extend far beyond the obvious destruction of attractive countryside and wildlife habitat," [48] yet on the other hand are funded by those who are responsible for this destruction.

Who Does The Countryside Alliance Support?

Shares:

Yet more double standards are apparent in the CA’s investments. It has more than

£40 000 worth of shares in Barclays bank, which caused a storm last year by closing 171 rural branches. [49] On one hand the Alliance is campaigning against these moves, whilst on the other, financially supporting them. Likewise, it holds £30 000 worth of investments in Shell, [50] whilst backing the oil protests in 2000o and simultaneously claiming to care about the environment, and also holds large investments in super-polluter ICI and ethically-challenged mining company Rio Tinto, not to mention arms and tobacco companies. [51]

PR and lobbying company PPS Group Ltd

The Countryside Alliance’s choice of PR and lobbying company is particularly noteworthy. Political Planning Services Ltd. may not be big, but it carries disproportionate weight, consisting of individuals who have worked closely with politicians in the past. Again, a great conflict of interest is present in the Countryside Alliance’s support for this company, since it specialises in trying to get through controversial planning applications. On its web page, it even boasted about helping US pharmaceuticals giant Pfizer to get planning permission for a new UK headquarters on greenbelt land! [52]

Past clients include McDonalds, Morrisons, Orange, Tesco and Sainsbury’s, not noted for their ecological thinking, nor for their equitable treatment of farmers, nor for their contribution to healthy local economies. [53] Through its support of PPS, the Countryside Alliance supports abuse of the planning system, whereby those who have money pay for lobbyists to get them round the planning laws, and cover the countryside with community-killing sprawl, whilst those who do not have difficulty getting permission to build themselves a single home and also bear the brunt of increased traffic, community decay and increasingly mind-numbing jobs. Likewise, being a specialist in controversial planning applications, PPS has over 20 home-building, construction and quarrying companies on its client list [54], and the Countryside Alliance supports this whilst at the same time expressing concern about the destruction of the countryside.

Lastly, concerning PPS, it is worth noting that Mark Pendlington, former managing director at PPS Group, is now Chief Executive of the Country Land and Business Association (CLA), bringing out yet more cosy links between landowners, big business and manipulation of government. [55]


The Times – Thursday March 28th 2002

The future

By the time this booklet is printed the Countryside Alliance will have already announced when it is planning to march in London.

Our challenge is to make sure that people know it is an organisation for the defence of bloodsports, not an organisation which can address the wider problems of diminishing incomes for rural people, not an organisation which will stop the countryside being covered in concrete and pollutants, and not an organisation which will devote any significant resources to improving the quality of our food.

On one hand the Countryside Alliance says it cares about social exclusion, on the other hand, its staff consists of bankers and landlords who specialise in the unequal distribution of wealth, and its shareholdings perpetuate this.

On one hand it says it is concerned with the fate of the whole countryside, on the other hand it devotes scarcely any resources to non-bloodsports issues.

On one hand, it expresses concern about the environment, on the other hand its staff and donors are busily covering the land in overpriced housing and its shareholdings and PR company are facilitating this.

People who care about the countryside must show the Countryside Alliance up for the fraud that it is, and must break its virtual monopoly as the’ voice of the countryside’.

[1] Countryside Alliance, Annual Report and Accounts 2000, p. 19-24

[2] Stewart, Ben, (Campaign for the Protection of Hunted Animals), The Countryside Alliance – a Briefing, unpublished

[3] http://www.mishcon.co.uk/fir/fir_d/fir_d_peop/fir_d_peop30.htm , last viewed 22nd June 2001

[4] "Rural Lobby Takes Aim At Theme Park Britain", Times,

[5] Select Committee on Standards and Privileges Twelfth Report, Annex A, (letter to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards from Mr Dale Campbell-Savours MP), HMSO, 10 February 1998, including excerpt from Countryside Movement Annual Report and Accounts for the year ending 31st March 1997.

[6] House of Commons Hansard Debates for March 3rd 1995, www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm199495/cmhansrd/1995-03-03/Debate-3.html

[7] ibid

[8] http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:u5RtOK_jg5M:www.panmacmillan.com/AV/MaxHastings.htm+%22Max+Hastings%22&hl=en , last viewed 25th June 2001.

[9] Say, Judy, "So What is The Countryside Movement Up To?" www.oneworld.org/tlio/research/le3say.html

[10] Stewart, Ben, (Campaign for the Protection of Hunted Animals), The Countryside Alliance – a Briefing, unpublished

[11] Ibid

[12] www.countryside-alliance.org/news/latest/00/000718honest.htm

[13] www.countryside-alliance.org/news/02/020327hone.htm

[14] www.countryside-alliance.org/news/01/010718camp.htm

[15] www.mishcon.co.uk

[16] "Guardian of the Land", Horse and Hound, 15th February, p10

[17] "Board Changes at Countryside Alliance", Press release, Countryside Alliance, 7th July 1998

[18] Who’s Who 2000, A and C Black, London 2000, p291

[19] Gone to Claridge’s", The Spectator, 20th January 2001

[20] RSPCA Head ‘Enlisted Hunters’, Times Wednesday May 2nd 2001

[21] "Next Step Forward for the Countryside Alliance", Press release, Countryside Alliance, 26th March 1998, http://www.countryside-alliance.org/news/latest/980326sgm.htm

[22] "Countryside ‘army’ descend on Labour", This is London, September 29th 1999

[23] Maurice Askew of the Country Sports Workers at the Welsh Countryside March and Rally, Western Mail, November 11th 1999

[24] Caroline Tisdall, potted biography for Countryside Alliance Board elections 2001.

[25] Prince’s Aide Revives Row Over GM Food, The Guardian, 28th September 1999.

[26]Prince named as secret backer of hunt lobby, The Guardian, 26th September 1999.

[27] British Endurance-Riding Association, Latest News March 2000, http://www.british-endurance.org.uk/ghr_pressnews.html , last viewed 9th July 2001

[28] www.countrysidefoundation.org.uk/WhatisCFE/Trustees/RW-Cmain.htm

[29] "Next step forward for the Countryside Alliance, 26th March 1998, www.countryside-alliance.org/news/latest/980326sgm.htm

[30] East Northamptonshire Anti-BloodSports News, December 2nd 2000 www.northantshsa.org.uk/news.htm "Hunt Master hospitalises Saboteur" Kettering Hunt Saboteurs news release 11th February 1995

[31] "New Chairman For Campaign For Shooting and Alliance Shooting Committee", Press Release, Countryside Alliance, 21st June 1999

[32] "Is it Hair or Blague?", The Observer, 31st December 2000

[33] Unholy Alliance, The Observer, 15th October 2000

[34] Baroness Mallalieu’s speech at the Hyde Park Rally, later repeated in her submission to the Hunting Inquiry http://www.huntinginquiry.gov.uk/evidence/baronessmallalieu.htm

[35] Who’s Who 2000, A and C Black, London, p.1139

[36] Countryside Alliance Annual Return 2000

[37] ibid.

[38] ibid.

[39] http://production.investis.com/aggreko/board/ last viewed 9th July 2001

[40] "Prince Named As Secret Backer Of Hunt Lobby", The Observer, 26th September 1999

[41] "Tenants Revolt Over Duke’s Homes Plan", Daily Express, 10th February 2000.

[42] "Revealed: How Britain’s Richest Man Takes A £3m Tax Hand-Out, The Observer, 20th May 2001

[43] "Rural Lobby Takes Aim At Theme Park Britain", The Times, 17th November 1995

[44] "Back In The Hunt", The Guardian, 4th October 2000.

[45] "Country Alliance Seeks New Image", The Times, 4th April 1998

[46] Anonymous source, June 2001

[47] Stewart, Ben, (Campaign for the Protection of Hunted Animals), The Countryside Alliance – a Briefing, unpublished.

[48] E.g. www.countryside-alliance.org.uk/country/development.htm , last viewed 9th July 2001

[49] "Fury Over Rural Lobby’s Shares" The Observer, 29th April 2001

[50] Ibid.

[51] Ibid.

[52] www.ppsgroup.co.uk, this claim was removed from their web-site following a re-vamping in early 2001

[53] www.ppsgroup.co.uk – as of March 28th 2002

[54] Ibid

55. "New Chief Executive Announced For CLA", CLA Press Release, 23rd January 2001 http://194.200.85.11/sources/27/171/4015965/01009HQ.htm

 

Information required on 367 Kennington Road, London SE11 4QT

Records checked at the Land Registry on April 2nd 2002 revealed that the property occupied by The Countryside Alliance at 367 Kennington Road, London SE11 is owned by Kennington Estates Limited. They company has, in the last six to seven years, had a number of registered addresses. The latest one is Sue Smith Accountancy, First Floor, 134 Oatlands Drive, Oatlands Village, Weybridge, Surrey KT13 9HJ [company no 02998334]

The company has three directors – Catherine Rachel Leigh Wood [secretary] of 35 Kensington Gardens, London W2 4BQ, Gideon Andrew Leigh Wood of the same address and Philip Adam Leigh Wood of 85 Kensington Gardens, London. They are directors in 70, 31 and 33 different companies respectively, including Kennington Estates Limted.

Interestingly, the sole shareholder, Kintyre Limited, of PO Box 175, 78 Marylebone High Street, London W1M 3DE does not seem to exist any more.

Thanks to Red-Star-Research for this information.

If anyone has any further information on these companies or individuals then it would be gratefully received.

 

next page